Millet Unpatented Technology Killed by Ericsson in India

No one would have imagined that Xiaomi, who was in the limelight in the Internet industry, actually planted a big comeback this time. Recently, the High Court of Delhi, India, issued an injunction to prohibit Xiaomi Technology from exporting and selling smart phones to the Indian market, and to send officials to supervise the Indian office of Xiaomi. When the news came out, the world was at a loss, and the fundamental reason was that Ericsson sued Xiaomi for infringement. Ericsson believes that Xiaomi’s products infringe on its key patents on communications technology standards. Ericsson tried to negotiate with Xiaomi for three years and Xiaomi Technology did not respond. According to this, it had to sue the court and demanded the court’s products for Xiaomi. Issued a ban on the sale of millet phones in the Indian market.

Millet is banned in India

Millet has grown rapidly in recent years. Shipments once reached the top in the world, and its flagship television ecosystem has become the object of competition in the industry. "Is been imitated and never surpassed." Xiaomi took this sentence to the extreme. In the eyes of outsiders, millet has its own fatal wounds, that is, there are few patents. According to relevant media reports, Xiaomi has almost zero in the core patent portfolio of communications, and only a few patents are mostly secondary patents for design. If compared with Apple, the quantity is 48 times; if compared with domestic traditional mobile phone manufacturers, the number of patents of Huawei in 2013 is 71,903, and the amount of invention patent granted has ranked No. 1 in the world for 7 consecutive years, and Xiaomi has only 1141 items in total. . Therefore, no matter whether it is compared with international manufacturers or with domestic manufacturers, Xiaomi does not have enough intellectual property to enter into a patent cross-licensing agreement with other smart machine manufacturers. This has left Xiaomi's future path full of risks.

Lei Jun

The ban on India’s High Court has caused Xiaomi to feel hurt. This point can be seen from the statement issued by Xiaomi “We have been forced to stop selling equipment in the Indian market until we receive further notice from the New Delhi High Court. As a law-abiding party The company, we will conduct a careful investigation of the matter and assess our legal choices. Please rest assured that we will do everything we can to restore the sales of mobile phones." Once vowed to do the world's largest mobile phone brand millet, once full of ambition Lei Jun This time, I am afraid I must be completely disappointed.

Millet mobile phone

Millet mobile phone sales in the Indian market are staggering. In the past year, Red Rice 1S has sold 500,000 units in India, and the newly launched Red Rice Note also received 150,000 bookings in a short period of time, and this sales volume is only the two models that Xiaomi launched in India. Just mobile phone, can think of Indian users of the millet phone in the end how much demand! The ban on Indian high courts has undoubtedly left Xiaomi in an abyss that never ends.

Internationalization of millet

Xiaomi has been criticized for his patents. First, Xiaomi and other vendors had been lawyers infringed by Huawei and ZTE. Although Huawei said that Xiaomi had temporarily placed a horse, ZTE does not seem to be able to stop. This was followed by the ban on the Indian High Court. Xiaomi’s inherently unresponsive attitude has completely failed this time. Patent flaws will undoubtedly affect the internationalization of millet.

In fact, in the face of patent injuries, Xiaomi did not sit still, but carried out a full range of improvements. Xiaomi continued to make up for its patent shortcomings from the second half of 2012. As of May 2013, Xiaomi’s patent applications totaled 336, including 297 invention patents, which grew rapidly. In 2014, the curve saved the country’s acquisition of chips. Patent company. However, these still do not make up for the difference in the patent strength of Xiaomi. It must be said that there are too many differences in the strength of patents.

"Honghu waves are more waves than waves." In patent countermeasures, they never believe in tears. They only believe in strength. If Xiaomi wants to be free from patent in the future, the only way is to make up for shortcomings as soon as possible. Only with a strong professional strength will not be "behind the waves on the beach."

Recommended installation sofa butler Download: http://app.shafa.com/